Missoula Redevelopment Agency BoardAgendaMeeting #:Date:Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 12:00 P.m. - 2:00 P.m.Location:ZOOM WebinarAttend by computer: Join the meeting Attend by phone: Cell phone users: 1-253-215-8782, 1-213-338-8477, or 1-267-831-0333; Landline users: 1-888-475-4499 or 1-877-853-5257 Webinar ID: 854 1925 2243 Password: 440260, Press *9 to raise your hand to be recognized for public comment, *6 to mute and unmute Watch the meeting: Web stream (live or on demand), YouTube, or Spectrum Cable Channel 190 For more ways to watch the meeting and submit public comment, see the Citizen Participation Guide. Issues? Call the City Clerk 406-552-6078. The City makes reasonable accommodations for any known disability that may interfere with a person's ability to participate in this meeting. Persons needing assistance should contact the MRA at 140 W. Pine St. Missoula, MT 59802 or call 406-552-6160 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.1.Call to Order Public Comments: 2.Introductions Public Comments: 3.Approval of Minutes Public Comments: 3.1February 17, 2022 Regular Board Meeting Minutes Attachments | Public Comments1.220217_Minutes.pdf4.Public Comments and Announcements Public Comments: 5.Action Items Public Comments: 5.1Bissinger Place - 903 South 1st Street West (URD II) - TIF Request (Gass) Attachments | Public Comments1.Bissinger Place - 903 S 1st St West.pdfBob OaksBissinger Place addresses much-needed density and residential capacity. I am confused by the following, however: “Dwelling units will vary... to provide rental rates ranging from market rate affordable to more luxurious..." “Market rate affordable” is an unusual expression and is not tied to any quantification to address “affordable to whom?” Would it be possible for MRA to require that a modest proportion of units here, and in similar projects asking for assistance, be affordable to median income Missoulians? For example, 10% (or four units in this case) priced to be affordable to households making between 90% and 110% of the area median income? Although small at first, in aggregate and over time, such MRA enabled investments could be a community-appreciated step beyond the other fine work the Agency does to support LMI housing and our new Housing Trust Fund. It seems that such a policy could provide the “but for which” true affordability quotients will not otherwise happen.5.2500 Block of Burton Street - Improvements (URD II) - Request to Amend Engineering Contract with Morrison-Maierle (Gass) Attachments | Public Comments1.Burton St Improvements - Amendment to Morrison Maierle Agmt.pdf5.3500 Block of Burton Street - Improvements (URD II) - Request to Award Construction Contract (Gass) Attachments | Public Comments1.Burton St Improvements - Award Construction Contract.pdf5.49 Year Strategic Exit Plan (URD II) - Request for Approval (Buchanan) Attachments | Public Comments1.9 Year Strategic Exit Plan URD II.pdf6.Non-Action Items Public Comments: 7.Staff Reports Public Comments: 7.1Director's Report Attachments | Public Comments1.Directors Report March 2022.pdf7.2Budget Reports Public Comments: 7.2.1FY22 Budget Status Reports Attachments | Public Comments1.FY22 MRA Budget Status Reports 2022-02 with memo.pdf8.Committee Reports Public Comments: 9.Other Items Public Comments: 10.Adjournment Public Comments: No Item Selected Attachments (0) | Public Comments (0)This item has no attachments1.Burton St Improvements - Amendment to Morrison Maierle Agmt.pdf1.Burton St Improvements - Award Construction Contract.pdf1.9 Year Strategic Exit Plan URD II.pdf1.FY22 MRA Budget Status Reports 2022-02 with memo.pdf1.Directors Report March 2022.pdf1.220217_Minutes.pdf1.Bissinger Place - 903 S 1st St West.pdfThis item has no public commentBob OaksBissinger Place addresses much-needed density and residential capacity. I am confused by the following, however: “Dwelling units will vary... to provide rental rates ranging from market rate affordable to more luxurious..." “Market rate affordable” is an unusual expression and is not tied to any quantification to address “affordable to whom?” Would it be possible for MRA to require that a modest proportion of units here, and in similar projects asking for assistance, be affordable to median income Missoulians? For example, 10% (or four units in this case) priced to be affordable to households making between 90% and 110% of the area median income? Although small at first, in aggregate and over time, such MRA enabled investments could be a community-appreciated step beyond the other fine work the Agency does to support LMI housing and our new Housing Trust Fund. It seems that such a policy could provide the “but for which” true affordability quotients will not otherwise happen.