Missoula Redevelopment Agency BoardAgendaMeeting #:Date:Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 12:00 P.m. - 2:00 P.m.Location:ZOOM WebinarAttend by computer: Join the meeting Attend by phone: Cell phone users: 1-253-215-8782, 1-213-338-8477, or 1-267-831-0333; Landline users: 1-888-475-4499 or 1-877-853-5257 Webinar ID: 854 1925 2243 Password: 440260, Press *9 to raise your hand to be recognized for public comment, *6 to mute and unmute Watch the meeting: Web stream (live or on demand), YouTube, or Spectrum Cable Channel 190 For more ways to watch the meeting and submit public comment, see the Citizen Participation Guide. Issues? Call the City Clerk 406-552-6078. The City makes reasonable accommodations for any known disability that may interfere with a person's ability to participate in this meeting. Persons needing assistance should contact the MRA at 140 W. Pine St. Missoula, MT 59802 or call 406-552-6160 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.1.Call to Order Public Comments: 2.Introductions Public Comments: 3.Approval of Minutes Public Comments: 3.1March 17, 2022 Regular Board Meeting Minutes Attachments | Public Comments1.220317_Minutes.pdf4.Public Comments and Announcements Public Comments: 5.Action Items Public Comments: 5.1318-322 Levasseur Street (Front Street URD) - Request to Proceed Without Prejudice (Gorski) Attachments | Public Comments1.Levasseur Street PWP.pdfBob OaksThis is, of course, a much smaller project than the Bissinger Place development that was considered too far along in the process to discuss affordability requirements, but could MRA involvement now preface requirement that one of the 6 condominiums built be affordable to <120% AMI? 5.2Bateman Duplex - 1417 1/2 South 2nd Street West (URD II) - TIF Request (Marchesseault) Attachments | Public Comments1.Bateman Duplex.pdf5.3Scott Street Property Development - Reimbursement Resolution (North Reserve-Scott Street URD) - Request for Approval (Buchanan) Attachments | Public Comments1.Scott Street Reimbursement Resolution.pdf5.4North Reserve-Scott Street URD - Boundary Modification - Request for Approval (Gorski) Attachments | Public Comments1.Diversified Plastics_NRSS Boundary Amendment.pdf5.5URD III Southern Sidewalk Project - Request to Award Construction Contract (Gass) Attachments | Public Comments1.URD III Southern Sidewalk Project.pdf6.Non-Action Items Public Comments: 6.1Riverfront Triangle Development - Update Attachments | Public Comments1.RiverfrontTriangle memo.pdf2.RivFroTri MRA deck 04 15 2022.pdf6.2Mountain Line Facility - Concept Presentation Attachments | Public Comments1.Mountain Line Presentation.pdf6.3Communication Plan Implementation - Update Public Comments: 6.3.1Engage Missoula Survey Attachments | Public Comments1.Survey_Responses_Report.pdf6.3.2MRA Communication Specialist Hiring Process Public Comments: 7.Staff Reports Public Comments: 7.1Director's Report Attachments | Public Comments1.Directors Report 04-22.pdf7.2FY22 Budget Reports Attachments | Public Comments1.FY22 MRA Budget Status Reports 2022-03 with memo.pdf7.3FY22 Staff Activities Reports (11/20/21-4/9/22) Attachments | Public Comments1.Staff Activities Reports 11_20_21 - 4_9_22.pdf8.Committee Reports Public Comments: 9.Other Items Public Comments: 10.Adjournment Public Comments: No Item Selected Attachments (0) | Public Comments (0)This item has no attachments1.Levasseur Street PWP.pdf1.Bateman Duplex.pdf1.Scott Street Reimbursement Resolution.pdf1.URD III Southern Sidewalk Project.pdf1.RiverfrontTriangle memo.pdf2.RivFroTri MRA deck 04 15 2022.pdf1.Survey_Responses_Report.pdf1.Staff Activities Reports 11_20_21 - 4_9_22.pdf1.Directors Report 04-22.pdf1.Diversified Plastics_NRSS Boundary Amendment.pdf1.FY22 MRA Budget Status Reports 2022-03 with memo.pdf1.220317_Minutes.pdf1.Mountain Line Presentation.pdfThis item has no public commentBob OaksThis is, of course, a much smaller project than the Bissinger Place development that was considered too far along in the process to discuss affordability requirements, but could MRA involvement now preface requirement that one of the 6 condominiums built be affordable to <120% AMI?